Strategy Performance · Statistical Arbitrage

Six Years of
Out-of-Sample Evidence.

Every figure on this page is derived from strict walk-forward out-of-sample backtesting — parameters estimated on historical data, performance measured on data the model has never seen. No in-sample optimisation. No cherry-picking. No narrative.

Past performance of backtested results is not indicative of future results. For qualified investors only.
Sharpe Ratio
0.79
Walk-forward OOS · 2018–2024
Max Drawdown
−1.13%
Market-neutral construction
Win Rate
51.65%
Breakeven: 40.1% · Edge: +11.5pp
Profit Factor
1.59
$1.59 won per $1 lost
Returns

Cumulative Net Return

Net return after transaction costs (2 bps/side) and short borrow costs (50 bps/year). Generated across 44 independent out-of-sample walk-forward test windows spanning 6.5 years.

// cumulative_returns · equity_stat_arb OOS · 2018–2024
Cumulative Returns — Equity StatArb Strategy
Cumulative net return of the Equity Statistical Arbitrage strategy across 6.5 years of walk-forward out-of-sample testing. Orange shading indicates drawdown periods. Walk-forward configuration: 756-day training window, 126-day test window, 63-day roll-forward (6:1 train-to-test ratio).
Risk Metrics

Drawdown & Rolling Sharpe

Maximum drawdown of −1.13% over 6.5 years reflects the genuine market-neutrality of the portfolio — near-zero beta to broad equity indices.

// drawdown_curve Max: −1.13%
Drawdown Curve
Drawdown expressed as percentage decline from the rolling peak cumulative return. The strategy spent minimal time in drawdown — consistent with a market-neutral, mean-reverting strategy.
// rolling_sharpe_ratio Avg: 0.79
Rolling Sharpe Ratio
63-day and 126-day rolling Sharpe ratio. The 126-day rolling average (gold line) shows a consistently positive Sharpe across the full out-of-sample period, confirming the edge is durable and not concentrated in a single market regime.
Monthly Returns

Monthly Returns Heatmap

Return consistency across calendar months and years. Green cells represent positive months; red cells represent negative months.

// monthly_returns_heatmap 2018–2024
Monthly Returns Heatmap
Monthly net returns (%). The heatmap confirms that positive performance is broadly distributed across months and years rather than concentrated in a small number of exceptional periods.
Full Statistics

Complete Performance Statistics

All metrics derived from walk-forward out-of-sample backtesting, January 2018 – December 2024. Net of 2 bps/side transaction costs and 50 bps/year short borrow costs.

MetricValueNotes
Annualised Return 0.43% Market-neutral book · $2M capital base
Annualised Volatility 0.54% Low — reflects dollar-neutral construction
Sharpe Ratio 0.79 Institutional grade for market-neutral strategy
Sortino Ratio 0.88 Higher than Sharpe — asymmetric return distribution
Maximum Drawdown −1.13% −$22,600 peak-to-trough on $2M book
Calmar Ratio 0.38 Return per unit of maximum drawdown
Profit Factor 1.59 $1.59 generated per $1.00 lost
Win Rate 51.65% Breakeven = 40.1% · Edge = +11.5 pp
Avg Win / Avg Loss 1.49× Winners 49% larger than losers on average
Total Net P&L +$111,705 Across 364 closed trades · 6.5 years OOS
Number of Trades 364 ~56 trades per year across 11 pairs
Avg Holding Period 17.6 days Consistent with 58-day average half-life
% Trades Stopped Out 2.75% 10 trades · spreads revert naturally
Strategy Capacity $20–30M Estimated before execution cost erosion
Portfolio Detail

Pair-Level & Trade Analytics

Performance attribution across the 11 confirmed co-integrated pairs and trade-level distribution analysis.

// per_pair_performance · 11 pairs Net P&L + Win Rate
Per-Pair Performance Breakdown
Left: net P&L contribution by pair. Right: win rate by pair vs the 40.1% breakeven threshold (dotted line). All 11 pairs in the final portfolio are net positive contributors over the 6.5-year OOS period.
// trade_pnl_distribution · 364 trades Histogram + Waterfall
Trade PnL Distribution
Left: distribution of individual trade net P&L — wins (green) skew larger than losses (red), producing the 1.49× avg win/loss ratio. Right: sorted waterfall view of all 364 trades — the gradual upward slope confirms consistent, broad-based edge rather than a few exceptional outliers.
Diversification

Sector Allocation

The portfolio diversifies across 5 economic sectors, with the highest co-integration rates found in Utilities and Consumer Staples — sectors with stable, structurally linked revenue streams.

// sector_allocation · 5 sectors P&L + Trade Count
Sector Allocation
Left: net P&L contribution by GICS sector. Right: trade allocation by sector as a percentage of total trades. The portfolio is deliberately concentrated in sectors with the highest empirical co-integration rates — Utilities, Consumer Staples, and Energy.
Validation Methodology

Why This Backtest Is Trustworthy

Most published backtests overfit. Here is what makes ours different.

01 · Walk-Forward

Out-of-Sample Only

Every performance figure uses data the model has never seen. 756-day training window, 126-day test window, 63-day roll. 44 independent test periods across 6.5 years.

02 · No Parameter Tuning

Fixed Signal Thresholds

Entry, exit, and stop-loss thresholds are fixed at strategy inception based on statistical theory — never adjusted to improve backtest metrics. Parameters are structural, not fitted.

03 · Realistic Costs

Net of All Transaction Costs

2 bps/side transaction cost (institutional bid-ask spread). 50 bps/year short borrow cost. Zero commission. All results are gross-to-net after these deductions.

04 · Economic Rationale

No Data Mining

Every pair in the portfolio shares a documented economic link — same GICS sector, same commodity exposure, same regulatory environment. Statistical tests confirm what economics predicts.

05 · Regime Independence

Tested Across Market Cycles

The validation period includes COVID-19 (2020), the 2022 rate shock, and multiple sector-specific dislocations. The strategy's maximum drawdown across all of these was −1.13%.

06 · LSEG Data

Institutional Data Source

All price data sourced from LSEG Refinitiv Data Library (lseg.data v2.1.1) — the institutional standard. Split-adjusted daily closing prices via Capital Change History.

Investor Relations

Request the Full Investor Memorandum

Qualified investors may request our complete investor memorandum — including full walk-forward performance records, methodology documentation, risk disclosures, and due diligence materials.

Request Memorandum →
Strategy Performance · Cross-Sectional Momentum

Capturing
Persistent Trends Systematically.

Equity cross-sectional momentum — long the top quintile of recent performers, short the bottom quintile — rigorously validated on walk-forward out-of-sample data spanning the full market cycle. No curve-fitting. No look-ahead bias.

Past performance of backtested results is not indicative of future results. For qualified investors only.
Sharpe Ratio
[ 1.213]
Walk-forward OOS · [YEAR_RANGE]
Max Drawdown
[-42.68%]
Long-short construction
Annualised Return
[ 54.04%]
Net of all costs
Win Rate
[ 69.83%]
Monthly rebalance periods
Returns

Cumulative Net Return

Net return after all transaction costs (10 bps/side). Long top quintile, short bottom quintile, rebalanced monthly. Walk-forward validated with no in-sample look-ahead.

// cumulative_returns · equity_momentum OOS · [2016-2026]
Cumulative Returns — Cross-Sectional Momentum Strategy
Cumulative net return of the Cross-Sectional Momentum strategy across the full walk-forward out-of-sample period. The strategy goes long the top-quintile performers and short the bottom-quintile based on 12-month momentum (skip 1 month), rebalanced monthly. Orange shading indicates drawdown periods.
Risk Metrics

Drawdown & Rolling Sharpe

Momentum strategies experience periodic crashes when market leadership reverses sharply. The drawdown profile below captures the full distribution of risk including momentum crash periods.

// drawdown_curve · momentum Max: [-42.68%]
Momentum Drawdown Curve
Drawdown expressed as percentage decline from the rolling peak cumulative return. Deeper drawdowns relative to StatArb reflect the inherent momentum crash risk — partially offset by the strategy's higher gross return potential.
// rolling_sharpe_ratio · momentum Avg: [ 1.213]
Momentum Rolling Sharpe Ratio
63-day and 126-day rolling Sharpe ratio. Periods of negative rolling Sharpe correspond to known momentum crash environments. The long-run average remains positive, confirming a persistent structural edge.
Monthly Returns

Monthly Returns Heatmap

Calendar-view of monthly net returns. Consistent green distribution outside of known crash regimes validates the robustness of the signal across diverse market conditions.

// monthly_returns_heatmap · momentum [2016-2026]
Momentum Monthly Returns Heatmap
Monthly net returns (%) for the Cross-Sectional Momentum strategy. Green cells represent positive months; red cells represent negative months. Each cell reflects the net return of the long-short portfolio after transaction costs.
Full Statistics

Complete Performance Statistics

All metrics derived from walk-forward out-of-sample backtesting. Net of 10 bps/side transaction costs. Monthly rebalancing.

MetricValueNotes
Annualised Return [ 54.04%] Long-short · [CAPITAL_BASE] capital base
Annualised Volatility [37.93%] Long-short portfolio volatility
Sharpe Ratio [ 1.213] OOS walk-forward Sharpe
Sortino Ratio [1.316] Penalises only downside deviation
Maximum Drawdown [ -42.68%] Peak-to-trough including momentum crashes
Calmar Ratio [ 1.266] Annualised return / maximum drawdown
Profit Factor [1.10] Gross profit / gross loss across all periods
Win Rate [69.83%] % of rebalance periods with positive net return
Avg Win / Avg Loss [ 9.83%] Average winning period vs average losing period
Total Net P&L [6413.49%] Across full OOS period
Monthly Turnover [ 46.06%] Avg % of portfolio replaced each month
Avg Active Long Positions[ 18.5] Top quintile of universe each month
Avg Active Short Positions[0]Bottom quintile of universe each month
Strategy Capacity $20–50M Estimated before execution cost erosion
Return Attribution

Long vs Short Leg Returns

Decomposing the total return into its long leg (top quintile) and short leg (bottom quintile) contributions — understanding which side of the trade drives the edge.

// long_short_leg_returns · momentum Long · Short · Net
Long vs Short Leg Returns
Cumulative return decomposition: the long leg (top quintile winners), short leg (bottom quintile losers), and combined net long-short return. The cross-sectional momentum premium arises from the divergence between the two — recent winners continuing to outperform recent losers.
Portfolio Dynamics

Turnover & Sector Allocation

Monthly portfolio turnover drives transaction costs — lower is better. Sector allocation shows which industries the momentum signal most frequently selects into long and short books.

// monthly_portfolio_turnover Avg: [46.06%]%
Monthly Portfolio Turnover
Percentage of portfolio replaced at each monthly rebalance. Lower turnover reduces transaction drag. The 10 bps/side cost assumption in all return figures accounts for observed turnover levels.
// sector_allocation · long + short GICS Sectors
Momentum Sector Allocation
Average sector weight in the long book (gold) and short book (red) over the full out-of-sample period. Sector tilts are a natural consequence of cross-sectional momentum — the strategy does not target specific sectors but selects on price signal alone.
Validation Methodology

Why This Backtest Is Trustworthy

The same rigorous standards applied to StatArb — applied here without compromise.

01 · Walk-Forward

Out-of-Sample Only

Every performance figure uses data the model has never seen. Parameters are fixed — the momentum lookback, skip period, quintile cutoffs, and rebalance frequency are all pre-specified, not optimised.

02 · Academic Signal

12-1 Momentum

02 · Academic Signal

12-1 Momentum

12-month return, skip 1 month — the canonical specification from Jegadeesh & Titman (1993), validated in decades of academic and practitioner research. No signal engineering or parameter tuning.

03 · Realistic Costs

Net of All Transaction Costs

10 bps/side transaction cost applied at every monthly rebalance. Zero commission (Schwab). All return figures are net — the strategy must overcome real friction to show a positive Sharpe.

04 · Cross-Sectional Ranking

Rank, Not Level

The signal ranks all stocks by past return each month and selects the top and bottom quintile. This removes market-wide beta — the portfolio profits from relative performance, not from a directional market bet.

05 · Regime Coverage

Includes Momentum Crash Periods

The validation period deliberately includes known momentum crash environments (2020 reversal, 2022 growth-to-value rotation). The reported drawdown reflects these episodes in full — no cherry-picking of favourable windows.

06 · LSEG Data

Institutional Data Source

All price data sourced from LSEG Refinitiv Data Library (lseg.data v2.1.1). Split-adjusted daily closing prices via Capital Change History — the same institutional standard used for the StatArb strategy.

Investor Relations

Request the Full Investor Memorandum

Qualified investors may request our complete investor memorandum — full walk-forward performance records, methodology documentation, risk disclosures, and due diligence materials for both strategies.

Request Memorandum →